one. How does international humanitarian law treat the responsibility of commanders and other superiors for war crimes committed by their subordinates?b.What are the rules of the agreement to regulate criminal prosecutions against Colombian state agents? Is the difference in treatment between members of the state armed forces and members of armed opposition groups justified? What type of behaviour is document A, paragraphs 34 and 35, would state officials need an amnesty and deserve amnesty? Or at least the special treatment provided in Document B, para. 53?c. What is the criterion of the agreement to determine the command responsibility of members of the armed forces for crimes committed by their subordinates? Does the same test apply to FARC-EP leaders? Is the difference justified? Is this in international humanitarian law? Is it compatible with iHL? How does the agreement define “effective control” in Document A, point 40? (P I, 86 and 87; CIHL, Rule 153) N.B. In accordance with the disclaimer, neither the ICRC nor the perpetrators can be identified with the opinions expressed in cases and documents. In some cases, there are even solutions that clearly violate international humanitarian law. Nevertheless, they deserve to be discussed, if only to meet a challenge of showing more humanity in armed conflicts. Similarly, in some of the texts used in case studies, the facts cannot always be proven; Nevertheless, they were selected because they highlight interesting themes of the IHI and are therefore published for educational purposes. In this article, you will find the link to the English translation of the Colombian peace agreement recently put online. Please note the reservation in the text that contains the link which confirms that the translation has no legal value and that only the Spanish version is legally binding. 9. (Document A, paragraphs 38 – 40; Document B, par. 60) 7 (document A, para.
37, 41 – 42; Document B, paragraphs 52 – 54, 58, 62) Who can benefit from the amnesty of Law 1820/16? What is the impact of the amnesty? What crimes are amnestiable under the amnesty law? What offences are excluded? Do you agree with the definition of war crimes in document B, paragraph 58, as “any systematic violation of international humanitarian law”? What for? Why not? Can war crimes be covered by such an amnesty if they have not been systematically committed? Is this consistent with the usual war crimes obligations of states? Does the amnesty law relieve the Colombian state of its obligations to investigate and prosecute war crimes if they have not been systematically committed? (P II, s. 6, paragraph 5); CIHL, Rules 158 and 159) case created by Silvia Scozia, LL.M. Student at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law, under the supervision of Professor Marco Sasséli and Ms. Yvette Issar, scientific collaborator, both at the University of Geneva. You always appreciate your contributions. Hold on to the big work! 6. (Document A, at para. 29; Document B, paragraph 57) How “crimes committed as a result of armed conflict or directly or indirectly” are defined in Document A, at para. 29? Are you suggesting that this is an appropriate definition of the link to international humanitarian law necessary to address behaviour in armed conflict? 8.
(Document A, paragraphs 18, 49, 53, 57-58) How does the agreement govern the identification of FARC-PE members? How is identification related to the granting of amnesty? Is there a procedural guarantee for FARC-PE members who have been deprived of their liberty as a result of the handing over of the lists to the government authorities? 5. (Document A, paragraphs 27 – 37; Document B, paragraphs 56 – 61) What is the special jurisdiction for peace created by the agreement? What are its objectives? What crimes is she competent about?.
netviper digital studio